Understanding risk and enhancing safety in immunotherapy trials.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the past decade, there has been major progress in the development of novel immunosuppressive therapies. In addition, there have been advances in the clinical applications of these therapies to suppress both alloimmunity and autoimmunity. In some situations, however, the toxicity of the therapies, including infections, can limit their use. In this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Loechelt and colleagues performed monitoring for herpesviruses in 126 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) [1]. These patients were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The original trial did not find a significant protective effect of daclizumab and MMF on the loss of insulin-producing β cells in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes [2]; Loechelt et al concluded that daclizumab and MMF did not increase morbidity from herpesviruses. Nevertheless, the monitoring of these patients for herpesvirus infections has provided novel insights into the effects of common viral infections with the use of potent exogenous immunosuppression in the nontransplant setting. In the current study, the authors performed careful laboratory and clinical monitoring for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV). Both primary infections and reactivations were observed but significantly increased morbidity was not seen in patients receiving either one or both immunosuppressive drugs compared with placebo. There was a trend toward greater EBV viral burden (P = .06) in patients receiving both daclizumab and MMF compared to those on no immunosuppression. However, most patients were either asymptomatic or had a self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome. EBV is an important herpesvirus in transplantation; pediatric transplant patients especially are at greater risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), primarily because they are often EBV-seronegative prior to transplantation and may receive a seropositive organ. In this study, EBV viral loads were reportedly not significantly different from viral loads measured in transplant patients at the same lab. In the transplant setting, high EBV viral loads have been correlated with an increased risk of PTLD [3]; however, other than mononucleosis-like syndrome in 3 patients, there was no development of lymphoproliferative disease in the current study. This may have been due partly to the discontinuation of immunosuppression when 2 sequential positive viral loads were obtained. Viral load monitoring and subsequent reduction of immunosuppression has been shown to decrease progression to PTLD in the transplant setting [4]. In contrast to the transplant setting, the subjects in Loechelt et al’s study were also on fewer immunosuppressive agents than would typically be used and had not received a T-cell–depleting agent such as antilymphocyte globulin (a known risk factor for PTLD) [5]. Transplanted patients are often also on immunosuppressive regimens that include a calcineurin inhibitor and/or corticosteroids, in addition to MMF. There are various other contrasts between the type 1 DM setting and transplant setting. In a seronegative individual who has undergone transplant, there is an allogeneic stimulus and transfer of cells harboring latent virus (if the donor is seropositive). Also, ischemic injury to the graft and major histocompatibility complex mismatch could all promote local viral replication, Received 17 September 2012; accepted 24 September 2012; electronically published 5 October 2012. Correspondence: Atul Humar, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Alberta Transplant Institute, 6-030 Katz Center for Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E1 ([email protected]). Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013;56(2):255–7 © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals. [email protected]. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis855
منابع مشابه
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
Background and Purpose: The dapagliflozin’s safety profile in insulin-treated adult type-1 diabetes mellites (T1DM) patients remains poorly explored. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared the risk of all-cause side effects, study discontinuation of participants due to side effects, urinary tract infection (UTI), diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemia between dapagliflozi...
متن کاملRecent Progress in Allergen Immunotherapy
The efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without seasonal bronchial asthma and anaphylaxis caused by the sting of the hymenoptera class of insects has been clearly demonstrated in numerous well-designed, placebo-controlled trials. Immunotherapy whether by subcutaneous injection of allergen extract or by oral/sublingual routes modifies peri...
متن کاملSystematic review with meta-analysis Effectiveness and safety of orally administered immunotherapy for food allergies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The aim of using oral and sublingual immunotherapy with food allergies is to enable the safe consumption of foods containing these allergens in patients with food allergies. In the present study, a systematic review of intervention studies was undertaken; this involved the searching of eleven international databases for controlled clinical trials. We identified 1152 potentially relevant papers,...
متن کاملNoninjection routes for immunotherapy.
Allergen specific immunotherapy, together with drugs and allergen avoidance, is a cornerstone in the management of respiratory allergy. The traditional subcutaneous route is burdened with the risk of severe adverse events; therefore, safer routes of administration (noninjection or local routes) have been investigated and developed. Controlled trials failed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy a...
متن کاملWhole Tumor Cell Vaccine Adjuvants: Comparing IL-12 to IL-2 and IL-15
Cancer immunotherapy (passive or active) involves treatments which promote the ability of the immune system to fight tumor cells. Several types of immunotherapeutic agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, non-specific immunomodulatory agents, and cancer vaccines are currently under intensive investigation in preclinical and clinical trials. Cancer vaccines induce pe...
متن کاملActive specific immunotherapy with autologous tumor cell vaccines for stage II colon cancer: logistics, efficacy, safety and immunological Pharmacodynamics.
In the area of cancer treatment, immunotherapy with vaccines has suffered in the last five years, due to many clinical trial failures. One must keep in mind however, that many of the clinical trials conducted in the past decade were performed without the benefit of sound regulatory guidance or validated and compliant manufacturing processes. This has clearly been the case for patient specific, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
دوره 56 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013